Girls XC Rankings - Team
Rank | Team | Last Result | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
1
0
|
Woodbridge victory justifies this ranking, but the Bears know they need to work to stay on top.
|
||
2
0
|
Definitely still in striking range.
|
||
3
3
|
Great performance at Bob Firman moves this Wolfpack up.
|
||
4
1
|
Hasn't been at full strength; when Isabella Fauria returns, they'll be VERY good.
|
||
5
9
|
Dominating in the Bay Area, and their times at Dana Hills put them right on par with all but the top 2 squads from Woodbridge.
|
||
6
11
|
HUGE performance at Woodbridge, but then not quite as strong at Bob Firman this weekend.
|
||
7
2
|
Haven't seen enough from the Blue Devils yet this season, but I saw plenty the last few years to keep them here.
|
||
8
1
|
Very good start to the season, but hard to tell how this year's Woodbridge times compare to teams around the state.
|
||
9
13
|
Pleasantly surprised at how well they raced at Woodbridge.
|
||
10
1
|
Seems like McKenna Brown hasn't been at full strength so far this year, but the team has still been very strong. That bodes well for when she hits 100%.
|
||
11
1
|
Finally got Alyssa Bautista over the bad luck that was holding her back; this is a very good team.
|
||
12
N/R
|
Another very impressive early season, with good races against top NorCal teams.
|
||
13
4
|
Gosh, the Southern Section D2 race is going to be cutthroat in November!
|
||
14
N/R
|
The biggest story of the season so far - great performance against national competition at Woodbridge.
|
||
15
6
|
Solid looking squad that has raced well against good competition so far this year.
|
||
16
8
|
So glad to see Kelli Hines back, and this team has enormous potential with her in the lineup.
|
||
17
13
|
Hasn't been at full strength so far this season, and one of their returning top 7 may not be back this fall.
|
||
18
N/R
|
Didn't have the best race at Woodbridge (although they did hang), but showed potential with a strong race at Ed Sias earlier this month.
|
||
19
N/R
|
Woodbridge performance was more impressive because they ran on Friday and still stacked up well against sweeps and rated teams.
|
||
20
8
|
I get the feeling we haven't seen their best year, and I can't wait until we do.
|
||
21
6
|
Solid season debut at their home meet, but has a ton of competition in their division of the Southern Section.
|
||
22
N/R
|
Good performance at Mt. Carmel, but shorthanded at Dana Hills last weekend.
|
||
23
N/R
|
Hung with slightly depleted LCC team on Balboa Park course at Mt. Carmel.
|
||
24
8
|
Have battled some very good teams and lost close.
|
||
25
5
|
The best team in the Central Coast, but struggled just a bit against speedy Southern Section teams at Woodbridge.
|
Editor's Comments
Watch List: Yucaipa, Santiago Corona, Redondo Union, Centennial Corona, McFarland